Teaching creationism in science class as an alternative to evolution is inappropriate.

Unlike science, creationism cannot predict anything, and it cannot provide satisfactory answers about the past.

Evolution and creationism both require faith. It's just a matter of where you choose to place that faith.

Tax dollars intended for science education must not be used to teach creationism as any sort of real explanation of nature, because any observation or process of inference about our origin and the nature of the universe disproves creationism in every respect.

'Intelligent Design,' the relabeled, repackaged form of American creationism, has always had a problem. It just can't seem to produce any evidence.

Intelligent design, unlike creationism, is a science in its own right and can stand on its own feet.

Evolution and creationism both require faith. It's just a matter of where you choose to place that faith.